Formulating Zero-Sugar Carbonated Soft Drinks with High-Intensity Sweeteners

Zero-sugar carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) are sensory engineering projects. When you remove sucrose or HFCS, you lose not only sweetness, but also body, flavor lift, aroma carry, and the “rounding” that sugar provides. High-intensity sweeteners can rebuild sweetness—yet they bring challenges: sweetness timing, bitter/metallic notes, and stability constraints.

This technical guide focuses on how to design a sweetener system (often blended) that delivers a clean sweetness curve, good aftertaste control, and robust manufacturing performance for cola and fruit flavored CSDs.

Sweetness curve design Sucralose / Aspartame / Acesulfame K Acid & flavor interactions Stability & preservation Troubleshooting
Step 1

Define the target sweetness profile

The best sweetener system is the one that matches your brand’s sensory identity. Before you pick ingredients, define what “success” tastes like.

Sweetness curve

Think in 4 phases

  • Onset: how fast sweetness appears
  • Peak: maximum perceived sweetness
  • Decay: how quickly sweetness fades
  • Linger: the tail after swallowing

Sugar has a “balanced” curve; many HIS have slower onset or longer linger (and can feel “artificial” if uncontrolled).

Carbonation

CO₂ changes perception

Carbonation increases bite and perceived acidity, suppresses some sweetness, and can amplify bitter notes. Evaluate sweetness systems at the target carbonation level, not only in still syrup samples.

Practical tip: panel both still and carbonated samples to separate sweetener issues from CO₂ effects.

Body & fullness

Plan “sugar replacement effects”

Sugar contributes viscosity, mouth-coating, and flavor roundness. Zero-sugar CSDs often taste “thin” or “hollow” unless the flavor system and acid balance are tuned for sugar-free.

In CSDs, you usually solve this with flavor architecture and acid choice—not heavy hydrocolloid use.

Define targets

A simple target brief (what to write down)

  • Style: cola / lemon-lime / orange / mixed fruit
  • Sweetness intensity: “equivalent” to 8–11 °Brix sugar reference (choose your benchmark)
  • Curve: fast/medium onset, short/medium linger, clean finish target
  • Acid system: citric-driven (fruit) or phosphoric-driven (cola), or blend
  • Constraints: storage temperature, shelf life, packaging (PET/can), and market preferences
Step 2

Understand the main high-intensity sweeteners used in CSDs

Each sweetener has a different sweetness curve, taste signature, and stability behavior. In zero-sugar soda, you typically use blends to “engineer” the final sensory experience.

Sweetener overview

Strengths, weaknesses, and typical roles

Sweetener Typical strengths Common watch-outs Where it shines
Acesulfame K (Ace-K) Fast onset, good top-note lift, synergistic with other HIS Can add bitter/metallic edge at higher use; needs balancing Fruit CSDs, lemon-lime; as a “curve starter” in blends
Aspartame Sugar-like sweetness character; smooth profile in many CSDs Sensitivity to heat/time under certain conditions; manage syrup handling Cola and classic “diet” profiles; often paired with Ace-K
Sucralose Very clean sweetness at low use; strong sweetness impact Can feel “sharp” or have lingering sweetness if overused; needs curve shaping Fruit flavors, modern zero-sugar profiles; paired with Ace-K for balance

Note: actual sweetness perception depends on acid system, flavor type, caffeine, temperature, carbonation level, and regional taste expectations.

Synergy

Why blends work

Many HIS combinations produce sweetness synergy (more perceived sweetness than expected), allowing lower use levels and reducing aftertaste. Blends can also reshape onset and linger.

Aftertaste control

“Clean finish” is designed

Bitter/metallic notes are often a combination of sweetener signature + acid bite + flavor top notes. Use blends, acid tuning, and flavor masking to remove “diet cues.”

Robustness

Manufacturing tolerance

A system that tastes great at bench scale can drift in production due to pH changes, syrup strength variation, or CO₂ variability. Blends typically give a wider “acceptable window.”

Step 3

Blending strategies to match sugar-like sweetness

Think of blending as curve engineering: one sweetener provides fast onset, another provides body/roundness, and a third may provide clean impact or cost optimization.

Classic diet-style

Aspartame + Ace-K

A common approach for cola-style profiles. Aspartame provides a sugar-like character while Ace-K boosts onset and top-note sweetness. Sensory tuning often focuses on reducing metallic edge and controlling linger.

Modern zero-sugar

Sucralose + Ace-K

Often used for fruit CSDs and “cleaner” sweetness perception. Ace-K helps onset while sucralose provides strong sweetness impact. Tuning often focuses on controlling sharpness and long sweetness tail.

Three-part systems

Curve balancing

For challenging profiles, three-part systems can reduce the dose of any single sweetener and improve mouthfeel perception. The goal is not complexity—it’s a wider sensory “sweet spot” during shelf life.

How to run trials

A fast bench trial plan (low effort, high signal)

  1. Pick a sugar reference: make a carbonated reference at your target sweetness level (your internal benchmark).
  2. Choose 6–10 blend points: vary ratios while keeping perceived sweetness roughly constant.
  3. Test in carbonated form: evaluate onset/linger and off-notes under CO₂.
  4. Stress test: hold samples warm for a short period (e.g., accelerated check) to observe drift tendencies.
  5. Lock the curve: finalize ratio first, then adjust total sweetness and flavor architecture.

Best practice: train the panel to score (1) onset, (2) peak sweetness, (3) bitter/metallic, (4) lingering sweetness, (5) overall similarity to sugar reference.

Common mistake

Chasing sweetness with one sweetener

Over-dosing a single HIS often creates a “signature” aftertaste. Instead, blend to reach the target sweetness with lower individual doses, then use flavor and acid tuning to create fullness and a clean finish.

Step 4

Acid and flavor design: the hidden engine of “sugar-like” taste

In CSDs, acid does more than set pH—it shapes brightness, bite, flavor release, and sweetness perception. Matching the acid system to the flavor style is a major lever for zero-sugar success.

Fruit CSDs

Citric / malic logic

Citric acid delivers bright “top” sourness; malic can add a smoother, longer sourness impression that can support fruit depth. The right balance can reduce the need to over-sweeten.

Too much bite can expose sweetener aftertaste—acid tuning is an aftertaste control tool.

Cola CSDs

Phosphoric balance

Phosphoric acid delivers a different “bite” and dryness that suits cola profiles. In zero-sugar colas, sweetness curve and acid dryness must be balanced carefully to avoid a thin or harsh finish.

Flavor architecture

Build fullness without sugar

Sugar-free drinks often benefit from adjusted flavor layers (top/mid/base), modulation of cooling or citrus notes, and careful use of bitterness to avoid “hollow” impressions.

Practical sensory tip

Sweetness isn’t only “sweetener dosage”

If the drink tastes less sweet than expected, check acid level, CO₂, and flavor top notes before increasing sweetener. Over-sweetening is a common path to lingering sweetness and a “diet” finish.

Step 5

Stability and preservation in zero-sugar CSDs

A stable zero-sugar CSD requires control of pH, sweetener handling in syrup, hygienic processing, and (where used) correct preservative logic. Even when carbonation provides some protection, shelf-life design is still a system decision.

pH control

pH is a safety and flavor lever

pH affects preservative effectiveness, microbial risk, flavor brightness, and sweetener perception. Control pH with consistent acid dosing and good mixing practice.

Also control measurement: define temperature and method (pH meters drift; CO₂ affects readings if not managed).

Preservatives

When benzoate/sorbate makes sense

Many CSDs rely on low pH and good hygiene; some markets and formats use preservatives for additional safety margin. Preservative choice and dosing should follow your pH target and microbial risk assessment.

Always validate local regulations, product type, and target market expectations.

Syrup handling

Don’t damage your sweetener

Some sweeteners are more sensitive to high heat or prolonged holding. Manage syrup preparation temperature, holding time, and order of addition to reduce drift and protect taste.

Manufacturing checklist

Production controls that protect flavor consistency

  • Water quality: control hardness and off-notes (water impacts perceived sweetness and bitterness).
  • Mixing order: dissolve acids and salts fully before adding sensitive components; avoid local high concentrations.
  • Temperature discipline: avoid unnecessary heat exposure during syrup prep.
  • CO₂ control: keep carbonation level consistent—small changes shift sweetness perception.
  • Packaging: protect aroma and reduce oxygen pickup to prevent flavor flattening.
Worked example (concept)

A zero-sugar CSD design checklist you can reuse

The point is not a “universal recipe” (every brand and market differs). Use this as a structure for your internal formulation sheet.

Concept template

Zero-sugar carbonated soft drink – internal formulation sheet

1) Target sensory profile
- Style: (cola / lemon-lime / orange / mixed fruit)
- Sweetness benchmark: (choose sugar reference)
- Curve target: (onset / peak / linger)
- Finish target: (clean / slightly dry / round)

2) Sweetener system (high-intensity)
- Primary sweetener: (e.g., sucralose or aspartame)
- Secondary sweetener: (e.g., Ace-K for onset)
- Blend rationale: (curve + aftertaste control + robustness)
- Sensory risks to watch: (metallic, bitter, lingering, sharpness)

3) Acid system
- Acid type: (citric / malic / phosphoric / blend)
- Target pH range: (define)
- Bite/brightness target: (high / medium / low)

4) Flavor system notes
- Top notes: (citrus, cola top)
- Mid notes: (fruit body, spice)
- Base notes: (cola base, vanilla notes)
- Masking strategy: (if needed)

5) Manufacturing controls
- Syrup preparation temperature and hold time limits
- Mixing order and QC checkpoints
- Carbonation target and tolerance
- Packaging and oxygen pickup control

6) Shelf-life checks
- Sensory at: (0 / 2 / 4 / 8 weeks or internal schedule)
- Sweetness drift check
- Aroma loss / off-note emergence check
        

In practice, your sweetener supplier and flavor house often collaborate on the final curve + flavor pairing. A controlled template helps you run faster trials and document decisions for repeatability.

Step 6

Troubleshooting common zero-sugar CSD problems

Most issues are “system” problems: sweetener ratio + acid + flavor + CO₂. Use targeted fixes instead of simply adding more sweetener.

Problem

Bitter/metallic edge

  • Reduce reliance on one sweetener; increase blend synergy
  • Check carbonation bite (CO₂ may be amplifying the edge)
  • Re-tune acid level/type; excessive bite exposes off-notes
  • Adjust flavor top notes and masking strategy
Problem

Lingering sweetness / “diet” finish

  • Rebalance the sweetener ratio to shorten the tail
  • Increase “onset” component and reduce “linger” component
  • Adjust acid dryness/brightness for a cleaner finish
  • Consider flavor base notes to add roundness (reduce perceived tail)
Problem

Thin / hollow taste

  • Rebuild flavor architecture (mid and base notes)
  • Check acid balance (too sharp can feel thin)
  • Ensure sweetness peak is not too narrow (curve shaping)
  • Validate water quality (hardness and off-notes can flatten body)
Problem

Sweetness drops over shelf life

  • Check syrup preparation temperature and holding time
  • Validate pH control and storage conditions
  • Review oxygen pickup (aroma loss can mimic “less sweet”)
  • Confirm CO₂ retention (lower CO₂ can change sweetness perception)
Problem

Harsh bite / too sour

  • Reduce total acid slightly and re-evaluate sweetness (don’t chase with more sweetener)
  • Switch or blend acid types (brightness vs rounded sourness)
  • Check carbonation target and pouring temperature
  • Adjust citrus top notes that may be intensifying sourness
Problem

Flavor feels “flat”

  • Check aroma loss and packaging oxygen pickup
  • Review flavor dosage and top-note strategy
  • Ensure acid profile supports flavor release
  • Confirm sweetener curve is not masking aroma (over-linger can dull perception)
Best practice

Change one variable at a time

When troubleshooting, adjust one lever at a time (sweetener ratio, total sweetness, acid level/type, CO₂, or flavor architecture). Multiple simultaneous changes make it hard to learn—and slow down development.

Reference points

References worth keeping in your formulation folder

Use these as high-level anchors for additive terminology and permitted-use discussions. Always follow destination-market rules and customer requirements.

Codex

GSFA (food category permissions)

Codex GSFA provides food category guidance that many technical teams use as a baseline reference.

Open GSFA database

E-numbers

EU additive framework (overview)

For projects targeting EU markets, align labeling conventions and additive permissions with EU requirements.

EU food additives overview

Compendia

Purity & identity references

Customers may cite compendial references for purity criteria and analytical methods.

Food Chemicals Codex (FCC)

Compliance disclaimer

Important disclaimer

This article provides general technical guidance for formulation development and is not legal or regulatory advice. Sweetener permissions, labeling rules, and maximum use levels vary by market and product type. Always verify final compliance with the destination-market regulations and the brand/importer requirements.

LinkedIn
Verified Atlas Network
Official site of Atlas Global Trading Co.
Group Companies Logistics About Contact Privacy